African Intelligence
Cognitively impoverished populations cannot hope to build developed, industrial societies. Sub-Saharan Africa failed to ever develop a written language, literature, clothing, buildings, government, national borders, or a monetary system. Spoken African languages – which do exist – contain about 300 words. To this day, Somalia still has no central government or monetary system.
In America
A 2001 meta-analysis (an analysis of a large number of scientific studies) performed by Philip L. Roth et al.on millions of subjects confirmed the fact that the IQ of black Americans is one standard deviation lower than the IQ of white Americans. Translated into numerical figures, the black American IQ is 85.
In his magnum opus, Race, Evolution, and Behavior, the late French American and English American psychologist, John Philippe Rushton, wrote, “The lowest average IQs are found for sub-Saharan Africans — from 70 to 75. The IQ of 70 for Blacks living in Africa is the lowest group mean ever recorded…”
Rushton was actually incorrect in this assertion as Australian Aborigines (IQ of 62) and Khoisan (the preferred term for Bushmen — IQ of 54) score lower than African blacks.
The conservative American Jewish professor, Michael Levin, calculated the fraction of blacks with IQs above 140 (the IQ of the average mathematician) at 0.00001% to 0.003%, or roughly thirteen blacks in one year. This matches the statistical observation that even with relaxed standards regarding who is considered ‘black’, the number of blacks achieving a PhD in mathematics in one year is approximately three to four.
Blacks made up 66% of the students in classes for the educable mentally retarded (EMR) in 1970s San Francisco (Levin, 2012) despite constituting only 28.5% of the population.
Blacks in the media: “A lie repeated often enough becomes the truth”
After controlling for IQ, Herrnstein and Murray (1994) found that blacks are actually over 1.5 times more likely than whites are to be represented in prestigious white-collar occupations - evidence of racial preferences and quotas strongly favoring black people.
Instead of portraying black people as dimwitted, urban, athletic, or criminal, left-wing Jewish and European globalist elites intentionally use the media to paint a picture of people of African descent as being respectable, eloquent, scholarly, upscale, glamorous, heroic, noble, suburban, professional, physicians, surgeons, judges, attorneys, computer programmers, homebuyers, and luxury vehicle drivers.
Michael Levin writes in his book: "White [sic] elites strive to put blacks in a favorable light: producers of movies and television programs go out of their way to portray blacks as able, high-status figures; the black computer whiz has become a staple of action movies, and advertisers scrupulously include blacks in group photos." (Ch. 8)
These images have become so ubiquitous that no one questions them. Quite simply, they are part of a coordinated and intentional attack on worldwide society, the initial stages of which include this type of propaganda.
One is gravely mistaken to believe that propaganda like this could not infiltrate mainstream "reputable" media sources, such as CBS, CNN, the BBC, and the New York Times. And yet it has — and on an extraordinary scale.
Those who believe that the objective of the media is to impartially convey information and entertainment are naïve and seriously mistaken. Words, images, and film all have psychological effects, and the psychological effect is typically precalculated. This is the basis of propaganda.
Whites in the media: Psychological Inversion
Simultaneously, when white people do appear in the media, they are portrayed as socially dominant, immoral, backwards, culturally uninteresting, and constantly in possession of an irrational, “racist” hatred. The ultimate media taboo is to show a group of whites without at least one black person in it.
We are also inundated with the portrayal of “WASPs” as domineering polo players dressed in Ralph Lauren and Brooks Brothers and attending Harvard and Exeter – institutions that in reality drove out their last true Anglo-Saxon Protestants in favor of Jews decades, if not centuries ago.
The true Anglo-Saxon Protestants (including groups such as the Amish, Mormons, and Southern Baptists) are the opposite of every trait popularly ascribed to them: The reality is that they are impoverished, scorned, persecuted, and do not have a chance of ever attending Exeter, Cambridge, or Harvard. The median Protestant net worth is $26,000, compared to the median Jewish net worth almost six times as great at $150,000.
This media deification of Africans and demonization of Europeans has intentionally been used to lead the public – including the majority of whites – to a more favorable psychological view of blacks than of whites, in turn causing them to elect blacks to positions of power. As one of numerous examples, when Barack Obama ran against John McCain for the American Presidency, Obama’s blackness was seen as a positive characteristic, while McCain’s whiteness was seen as a negative characteristic.